Next: Conclusions
Up: Analysis and future work
Previous: Coordination of modules
Although the ability to make large, coherent moves is a strength of the
approach, it is also a weakness. SWO is poor at making small
``tuning'' moves in the solution space, but the coupled-search view of
SWO suggests an obvious remedy. SWO could be combined with local
search in the solution space, to look for improvements in the vicinity of
good solutions. Similarly, making small changes to a prioritization
would generally result in smaller moves in the solution space than result
from going through the full analysis and re-prioritization cycle.
Yet another alternative is genetic algorithm techniques for ``crossover''
and other types of mutation to a pool of nodes, as is done in OPTIFLEX.
Many hybrid approaches are possible, and we believe that the
coupled-search view of SWO helps to identify some interesting
strategies for combining moves of various sizes and kinds, in both search
spaces, adapting dynamically to relative solution qualities.
Dave Clements
1999-04-13