|
The Adaptive Webbrowser: Evaluation Step
Name |
The Adaptive Webbrowser: Evaluation Step |
Description |
Compared to other methods such as neural networks
and decision trees, the Bayesian
classifier performes pretty well.
In about 73% of the cases, the user agreed with
the websites the adaptive browser suggested. A
backpropagation neural network performed just as
well, but decision trees performed worse.
Additional
features that can enhance the performance include
predefining user profiles. Users themselves can
provide words that they consider good indicators
for websites of their interest. This way, the
browser uses prior knowledge about the domain
without having to learn it.
Also, using
lexical knowledge can enhance performance
further. Using knowledge about relations between
words can improve the quality of the list of most
informative words. This lists always contains
non-informative words like "other" and
"however", because they don't appear in
the stoplist (the list of words that can be
skipped, like "what", "its"
and "the"). Lexical knowledge can
improve the quality of the list by removing some
non-informative words.

|
|
|
Case Study |
The Adaptive Webbrowser Case
|
|
|